- How do the definitions in the first chapter compare to your own definition of instructional or educational technology? What experiences or other influences have shaped your definition? How has your definition changed from examining the definitions in the first chapter of this book?
My definition
of instructional technology has evolved over the past seven years of teaching
and continues to evolve after reading the chapters. My initial understanding of instructional technology
was allowing the students to work in the computer lab in Word documents and
using the internet for research. At this
time, we did not have computers in the classroom and the classes were assigned
a block of time for the computer lab.
Over the past three years, each student in my class had a laptop for use
at school and home and my classroom was equipped with a Promethean Board and
Elmo. The past three years immensely changed
my definition of instructional technology.
I once thought the students simply needed to use a computer in any
fashion but I now believe the students must use a piece of technology to “solve
problems, analyze data, develop multimedia presentations, and create visual
displays” to partake in meaningful educational technology, Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology (p. 21).
My definition of instructional technology discussed above
is student centered with the activity being emphasized but after reading
chapter one, I realize I am leaving out some important aspects. According to the text, instructional
technology “encompasses the analysis of learning and performance problems, and
the design, development, implementation, evaluation and management of instructional
processes,” (p. 5). Instructional
technology is not simply a teacher creating a lesson allowing the students to
use a computer as part of the assignment.
I now understand that teachers and other professionals in the field of
instructional technology work together to analyze and create objectives,
develop assessment instruments, develop instructional strategies, select
materials, and design and conduct formative and summative evaluations. My definition was too narrow and did not
encompass the need for assessment of the design to ensure effectiveness.
- Next, think of a lesson or unit of instruction that you have developed. Or if you haven’t ever taught or developed instruction, think of one that you have received. How does that lesson adhere or fail to adhere to the six characteristics of instructional design? How would you redesign it to better adhere to the six characteristics.
My most
recent teaching position was 6th grade math. For this particular lesson, The Pool Problem
pictured below, the instructional design is student centered, in that, I gave
minimal instruction that day and allowed the students to problem solve and work
through the activity as a group. It can
be difficult keeping math lessons student centered because it is easy for the
teacher to simply lecture while the students take notes.
The
expectation of the lesson was for the students to continue the pattern of the
pools relating perimeter and area and to discover an equation to continue the
pattern using a function table. The
lesson was goal oriented from a teacher’s perspective but I did not write the
goal on the student handout. By writing
the goal for the students to also see, the lesson would be more meaningful and
tangible to the students.
I attempted
to make the lesson meaningful by discussing the size of pools, which is a hot
topic in Texas. Students have a
difficult time realizing math is used in the everyday world in a variety of
professions.
In the days
leading up to this lesson, students had completed simple function tables and
discussed patterns. This lesson was
meant to be a culmination of the unit.
For the assessment, the students were expected to create a four square
concept box with each square depicting a deeper understanding of how function
tables work. The students worked in
groups to complete the four square concept box.
To enhance the reliability of the assessment, I could have each student
create their own four square concept box ensuring each individual student
understands function tables. Too often
one student in a group will have a deeper understanding than the rest of the
group.
The data
collected before the lesson included daily assignments and quizzes. Leading up to this lesson, the majority of
the students should have a deep understanding of function table. This was a relatively simple lesson, so it
did not require the help of a team. By
using a team consisting of an expert in math, expert in the use of technology,
and an instructional designer, I feel the lesson could go beyond pencil and
paper. The lesson is definitely lacking
in the use of technology.
Pool Problem
Materials:
-Square color tiles
-Large graph paper
-Colored Pencil
Say:
Margo Misfit is designing
gardens to go around the perimeter of the square
swimming pools. Each pool has a square center that is the
area of the water.
Margo uses color tiles to
represent the water. The gardens
around the pools
are also represented with
color tiles.
Here are pictures of the
three smallest square pools with the gardens around them.
Complete a four square
concept box with the following information:
Square 1: Sketch the first
three pools and the next three pools.
Square 2: Write three
descriptions.
How does the pool number
relate to the number of tiles used for the pool?
How does the pool number
relate to the number of tiles used for the garden?
How does the pool number
relate to the perimeter of the garden?
Square 3: Draw three
function tables to represent your descriptions.
Include
an equation using the variable “n”
Square 4: Copy the
following questions and answer them.
How many tiles will the
100th pool have?
How many tiles will the
100th garden have?
What is the perimeter of
the 100th garden?
|
- In the 3rd chapter, Reiser distinguishes instructional media from instructional design, excluding teachers, chalkboards, and textbooks from the definition of instructional media. Why? Would you consider teachers, chalkboards, and textbooks instructional media? Is the purpose of instructional design to incorporate media into instruction?The first three chapters of your book define the IDT (Instructional Design and Technology) field and provide a history of how it has evolved over time. In your blog post for this week, reflect on the following:
In the past instructional media was
described “as the physical means via which instruction is presented to
learners,” (p. 17). Using this
definition, teachers, chalkboards, and textbooks are used to present
instruction and are therefore instructional media. However, Reiser wants to distinguish
instructional media as the physical means instruction is presented with the use
of technology. By emphasizing the use of
technology, I agree that teachers, chalkboards, and textbooks are not instructional
media but can be used when implementing a lesson through technology.
Reiser’s definition of
instructional media places the emphasis on the use of technology to present
information including but not limited to, television, radio, and
computers. The definition of
instructional design emphasizes the creation process of lessons. Instructional media can be included in the
instructional design process.
I do not think the purpose of
instructional design is to incorporate media into instruction. Rather, the purpose is to create lessons with
objectives understood by both the presenter and student and meaningful
instructional strategies with constant revision and re-evaluation. Instructional media can be the mode of
presentation but it is not necessary.
I agree
with the diagram below. When a team of
instructional designers are working together, constant re-evaluation is
key. Throughout history, each new
technology was thought to be the next big thing in terms of instructional
design. I believe T.V. and radio did not
change the way teachers presented lessons since the students cannot interact
with T.V. and radio. The use of radio
and television in the classroom was often no different than the teacher
presenting a lesson. Through the use of
computers and iPads, instructional design may change the way instruction is
presented in the classroom. Computers
and iPads will allow students to interact with the lesson and create unique and
personal outcomes for assessment. The
instructional design above, allows the designers to constantly evaluate the
instruction at each stage of creation and implementation.
Hi Sara,
ReplyDeleteI have been teaching for about as long as you have and I had many of the same perceptions that you did when I began.
I liked your commentary on expanding our definition of how we define instructional media and technology use in the classroom. I think it is a common mistake for new teachers to just try to use computers at any cost, without examining their lessons for effectiveness, like you said.
I enjoyed reading about your math lesson. I teach Social Studies, so I think it may be easier for me to make my lessons student centered. I believe math teachers face the greatest challenge when it comes to balancing lesson effectiveness with maintaining a student-centered approach. You guys have SO much to cram in to a short amount of time!
Overall, I think we agree quite a bit in terms of how to define media in the classroom, as well as how it should be used effectively to assist the students in meaningful learning. Enjoyed reading your post!
Hi Sara. I really thought your response was very well written. I liked your definition of technology. My problem with technology in the classroom is that even within the same district not all schools have access to the same technology. Some schools may have student computers in the classroom and others may not. I currently do not have any student computers in my classroom. We do visit the computer lab daily but it is used for math and reading skill software. So the only technology access my students have is my teacher computer that is hooked up to a projector. Definitions of technology are also based on what access educators have.
ReplyDeleteYou're math lesson was interesting. It is difficult to incorporate technology in math. I liked how you set up the lesson to be student centered/led. Education has been moving away from "direct teach" and moving more toward students problem solving on their own.
I agree with you about technology not being absolutely necessary to every lesson. Sometimes by getting to fancy with technology we lose sight of the objectives and the students really don't master them. Good post.